First, to remind you, here's the reporting on the scandal back in 2011 from Kotaku:
One of the unlockable skills for Dead Island leading lady Purna allows her to deal extra damage against male victims. It's called Gender Wars in the game, but the original skill was named "Feminist Whore."There's a lot to unpack here, and one goal of my chapter is to expand what we mean by "representation" in games. Currently, whenever we criticize a game character for its politics, such as a racist or sexist stereotype, we tend to focus on the character art, animation, writing, and voice acting. Why not expand representation to encompass the richness of the entire game experience and game engine itself?
My analysis follows Mark Sample's excellent "Criminal Code: Procedural Logic and Rhetorical Excess in Videogames" in focusing on the procedural politics of game mechanics and balance, and comparing that to the systems as intended from the source code. FeministWhorePurna is an ideal case study: it was a contemporary event with modern game engine architecture and a player / modder community that practically did the gameplay and forensic analysis for me already. (I also forced myself to play a bit of Dead Island to verify everything.)
You'll have to checkout the full book from your library, or buy it, or whatever, to see the full essay, but I'll try to briefly summarize the argument here, and in more game developer-y language as appropriate:
|Screenshot of Purna's "new game" character selection dialog in Dead Island (2011) on PC. Note that she holds a rifle; her in-game play-style involves heavy use of guns.|
In any other game, this clearly-wronged rightfully-angry black woman could've been an extremely progressive portrayal of a woman in video games -- and so few games feature Aboriginal people! -- but I argue this isn't really the case here.
For comparison, the other playable female character Xian Mei (an East Asian woman from Hong Kong) vows to avenge her father and ends her monologue with, "I just need the opportunity to prove myself."
The contrast is clear: Purna is the angry emotional black woman who resents all white male cops, while Xian Mei is the patient competent lighter-skinned woman who feels indebted to her amazing dad. Guess which one the game pushes most strongly as a stand-in for capital-F Feminists?
To progress in the skill tree, players only need to choose 1 of 3 skills in each skill tier, and the player community consensus is that Gender Wars is definitely the best choice in this tier -- the other two adjacent skills are about melee weapons and kicking attacks, which are irrelevant to Purna, who specializes in shooting guns. Plus, the vast majority of zombie enemies and bosses in the game are male.
A bit about how this skill works in the game engine: Dead Island uses plain-text scripting files (.SCR files) to bind specific abilities to a player character. In pre-release versions, "default_player_setup.scr" seemed to function as a manifest to give the character Purna all her abilities, and one was "FeministWhorePurna." It's important to remember the internal code object is called "FeministWhorePurna" and not just "FeministWhore" -- the other playable lighter-skinned woman Xian Mei does not have this ability, nor any ability that interacts with gender -- only Purna is a feminist whore.
So from a gameplay perspective, as well as a technical perspective, the game pushes really hard for Purna, and Purna alone, to represent an angry feminist of color who uniquely specializes in sniping men from a distance.
Gendered damage bonuses are, of course, a long established video game trope. Modern Fallout games have player "perk" upgrades that give damage bonuses and extra conversation options against other genders. However, the damage bonuses here are trivial, and most players read this upgrade as an opportunity to unlock more narrative content. With ability names like "Black Widow" or even same-sex equivalents like "Cherchez la Femme", Fallout designers try really hard to frame these gendered upgrades in terms of seduction rather than violence. Dead Island departs from Fallout's tradition in focusing solely on aggression and a damage bonus, and offering it only to a black woman.
I believe many players would view gendered damage bonuses to be "apolitical" in the context of an open world sandbox design tradition, where most NPCs are "generic" (as opposed to important "named" NPCs) and players understand these generic identities as mostly meaningless and arbitrary. If the game engine freely spawns / despawns these characters based on the player's location, not even their existence matters. The generic identity is just a bunch of randomly selected traits that aren't supposed to mean anything beyond how best to incidentally kill them. This kind of system implies to players that generic instances of "female", "male", and "weak to fire spells" all boil down to the same type of meaning... basically, gamers usually reserve political meaning for named NPCs, cutscenes, and authored narrative content -- again, this is "seen" representation.
(Further reading: in his book on Jagged Alliance 2, Darius Kazemi argues that a much more generic-ized NPC trait system, as exemplified by X-COM, reflects a US-style "melting pot" multiculturalism that depicts race and gender as ultimately interchangeable and meaningless details -- versus Jagged Alliance 2's Canadian "mosaic" multiculturalism.)
|Screenshot of character selection screen in Dead Island (2011) on PC. The Purna character is highlighted, and the game UI clearly labels her as a "Firearms expert" from the first instant you see her.|
But maybe the worst part of the developers' technical complicity is that Dead Island systematizes gender solely to implement FeministWhorePurna. In this game, no men ever target women for being women, and because Dead Island omits any such systematization of misogyny, it depicts Purna's male-targeted resistance as totally unprovoked, coarse, trivial, and irrational.
This is why Dead Island is anti-feminist even if it omits the words "Feminist Whore": because the logic of misogyny is baked into the game systems itself. By simulating feminism but not misogyny, it argues that misogyny does not exist, and thus, portrays "Gender Wars" as an irrational one-sided emotional vendetta instigated by women of color "agitators" against "gender-blind" men who are also mostly "apolitical" generic NPCs.
I think a better game would emphasize that feminism exists in relation to misogyny, and show that feminism is more than one thing that one person does, even during a zombie apocalypse. What if Dead Island systematized more than one kind of feminism? What if feminism had its own skill tree? What if feminism was a set of evolving strategies and play styles across the lifetime of an entire player community?
Those are big design challenges, but I think Dead Island still could've reflected the complexity of feminism in much smaller ways as well:
- Taxonomy -- what if Gender Wars was in the "Survival" skill tree instead of the "Combat" skill tree? What if feminism was just what women had to do to survive?
- Defensive, reactive -- what if Gender Wars gave Purna +15% defense against hostile men?
- Women-centered solidarity -- what if Gender Wars gave all nearby women players +15% defense when hostile men attack them, and +5% more defense with each additional nearby woman?
- Pan-gender liberation via active revolutionary resistance -- what if Gender Wars had a 15% chance, per nearby woman-inflicted attack on a hostile man, to permanently convert hostile men to friendly allies -- and converted men get +5% defense when fighting a woman's attacker?
- etc, etc, etc
It is my earnest misguided hope that, some day, gender in RPG sim games will move beyond simple damage bonuses or even Fallout's fuck bonuses. What if we treated gender with the same complexity we devote to countless bullshit gun crafting systems? A boy can dream...
In the end, this isn't just about Dead Island. Instead, I want to emphasize Dead Island as a case study of how we shape and understand our worlds, both real-life and virtual.
GAME DESIGNERS / DEVELOPERS:
- Do you systematize gender in your game? Do your systems suggest any equivalencies between gender and any other systems? How, when, and why?
- If genders affect each other, is that interaction defensive or offensive, anticipatory or reactive, reciprocal or lopsided? How, when, and why?
- How do you systematize gender in code? Do you represent gender as a true-or-false "isMale" boolean or a single-precision "femininity" float ranging from 0.0 to 1.0? What if gender was a 3D vector or a quaternion, or a bidirectional graph, or a neural network? What if gender was a process / function, instead of stored static data?
- If you're a misogynist or racist or whatever with something to hide, then cover up all your shit and pray that no one ever digs into your game... And when someone inevitably does, then at least own-up to your biases and don't try to claim your sexism is scientific or something, because that shit is embarrassing.
- If you're a cis-heterosexual upper-middle-class white man who wants to do the right thing, but finds all of this terribly intimidating, and you feel like this is a minefield -- then maybe call upon diverse expertise on this -- hire, and/or collaborate with, diverse people! Expand who you talk to, who you show your work to, and who you work with; de-segregate your social circles. Over-turning dominant power structures in the world takes work, and is rarely cheap or easy, but it is worth it.
- Walkthroughs / strategy guides can offer comprehensive second-hand gameplay analysis; try to read a variety of reviews, fan wikis, GameFAQS, and player forums, to understand a large sample of popular opinion and arguments. If possible, verify by playing it yourself too.
- Modders and modding tutorials offer technical game engine analysis that game developers will rarely disclose to you themselves (because of trade secrets, NDAs, studio PR policies); again, read a variety of articles and tutorials, and if possible even try to perform the modding yourself to verify it. After all, we wouldn't have ever known about FeministWhore unless a modder looked at the game's script files and documented it.
- Remember that digital representation is more than just "raw images", digital media is always interpreted and modified by "unseen" hardware and software layers. Interactive digital representation is further mediated by unseen notions of feel, interface, mastery, and user experience.